Comparison
Apollo.io vs Dubsado
Side-by-side comparison of Apollo.io and Dubsado. See pricing, features, ratings, and more.
| Feature | Apollo.io | Dubsado |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Reviews | 1 | 1 |
| Categories | Lead Management, Sales Automation, Contact Management | Contact Management, Project CRM, Small Business CRM |
| Pricing | From $49 | From $27.92 |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Pros | 275M+ contact database with intent topics, job-change signals, and visitor identification in one tool, Fast filter-to-sequence workflow — outbound campaign live the same afternoon, with dialer and meeting scheduling included, Genuinely usable free plan (900 credits/seat/year) and a $49 Basic tier that replaces a database + sequencer stack, Native Salesforce, HubSpot, and Pipedrive integrations so it can sit alongside a real CRM, High review volume and satisfaction (4.7/5 across 9,000+ G2 reviews at time of writing) | Full client lifecycle in one system: lead capture, proposals, e-signed contracts, invoicing with payment plans, scheduling and client portals that hand off cleanly, Automation workflows are more expressive than most rivals in this category — trigger chains across emails, forms, tasks and invoices, Strong value: $335-$525 per year with unlimited clients/projects and three free additional users; brands add-on at $10/month, Free email and live-chat support plus free bi-weekly live demo sessions with Q&A — support is consistently rated above ease-of-use, Client portal drew unprompted praise from clients in my testing — the polished end-client experience reflects back on the business |
| Cons | Data accuracy below the vendor's 98% claim in practice — 10-15% bounce rates on unverified lists, weaker data outside North America, Credit system is confusing: pooled, no rollover, auto-renewing add-on credits, and all seats must share one plan tier, Reporting is shallow and the interface adds clicks where it shouldn't; no mobile app for data access, CRM and deal layer too thin for complex, multi-stakeholder sales cycles, Users report credit-rule changes over time that unfavorably affected annual-billing customers | Real learning curve: the project/workflow/form concepts need study before serving live clients; Capterra ease-of-use trails its support score, Starter plan allows only one active lead-capture form and excludes workflows, scheduling and public proposals — most businesses need Premier, Revenue and finance reporting is thin beyond basic summaries; service-line profitability needs spreadsheet exports, Email is integrated, not native — heavy triage happens in your own inbox, and there is no real email marketing, No sales-pipeline machinery (lead scoring, probabilities, forecasting); it stops where the sales org begins |
| Best For | Outbound-focused SMB and mid-market sales teams that need B2B contact data plus sequencing in one subscription and already run their pipeline in a dedicated CRM. | Solo and tiny client-services businesses — photographers, designers, planners, coaches and consultants — who want the admin around their work handled by one system. |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| HQ Country | US | US |