Comparison
Apollo.io vs Salesflare
Side-by-side comparison of Apollo.io and Salesflare. See pricing, features, ratings, and more.
| Feature | Apollo.io | Salesflare |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Reviews | 1 | 1 |
| Categories | Lead Management, Sales Automation, Contact Management | Contact Management, Sales CRM, CRM Automation |
| Pricing | From $49 | From $0 |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Pros | 275M+ contact database with intent topics, job-change signals, and visitor identification in one tool, Fast filter-to-sequence workflow — outbound campaign live the same afternoon, with dialer and meeting scheduling included, Genuinely usable free plan (900 credits/seat/year) and a $49 Basic tier that replaces a database + sequencer stack, Native Salesforce, HubSpot, and Pipedrive integrations so it can sit alongside a real CRM, High review volume and satisfaction (4.7/5 across 9,000+ G2 reviews at time of writing) | Automatic data capture from email, signatures, calendars, social profiles and website visits — the CRM stays current without manual entry, Cold-relationship nudges based on real interaction cadence, not a stale 'last contacted' column, Transparent public pricing with a 30-day trial: $29/$49/$99 per user per month on annual billing, Sidebars inside Gmail, Outlook and LinkedIn plus solid mobile apps mean reps never leave where they already work, Enterprise tier includes done-for-you data migration, tailored training and a dedicated account manager |
| Cons | Data accuracy below the vendor's 98% claim in practice — 10-15% bounce rates on unverified lists, weaker data outside North America, Credit system is confusing: pooled, no rollover, auto-renewing add-on credits, and all seats must share one plan tier, Reporting is shallow and the interface adds clicks where it shouldn't; no mobile app for data access, CRM and deal layer too thin for complex, multi-stakeholder sales cycles, Users report credit-rule changes over time that unfavorably affected annual-billing customers | Scope stops at sales: no branching marketing automation, help desk, quoting or custom objects, Lead search is credit-metered — 5 credits on Growth — and serious prospecting needs a separate tool like Apollo.io, User permissions and custom dashboards require Pro ($49/seat annual), so Growth teams with governance needs pay more, Enterprise's five-user minimum excludes the tiny teams that would benefit most from white-glove onboarding, Small independent vendor: thinner enterprise case-study record and ordinary small-company roadmap risk |
| Best For | Outbound-focused SMB and mid-market sales teams that need B2B contact data plus sequencing in one subscription and already run their pipeline in a dedicated CRM. | Two-to-ten-person B2B teams whose deals come through relationships and whose CRM adoption has previously died of manual data entry. |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| HQ Country | US | BE |