Comparison
CiviCRM vs Salesflare
Side-by-side comparison of CiviCRM and Salesflare. See pricing, features, ratings, and more.
| Feature | CiviCRM | Salesflare |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Reviews | 1 | 1 |
| Categories | Contact Management, CRM Customization, CRM Integrations | Contact Management, Sales CRM, CRM Automation |
| Pricing | From $0 | From $0 |
| Pricing Model | free | freemium |
| Pros | $0 license with no per-user, per-contact, or per-donation fees — unbeatable economics for large or complex constituent databases, Deepest nonprofit feature set available: contributions, pledges, memberships, events, grants, case management, advocacy, Runs inside WordPress/Drupal/Joomla/Backdrop so website activity and CRM records share one database with no sync layer, Actively developed (6.19 released October 2026, monthly releases, ESR line supported to April 2027); full data ownership under AGPL, CiviSpark hosted option from $15/month per instance with unlimited users removes the ops burden for small organizations | Automatic data capture from email, signatures, calendars, social profiles and website visits — the CRM stays current without manual entry, Cold-relationship nudges based on real interaction cadence, not a stale 'last contacted' column, Transparent public pricing with a 30-day trial: $29/$49/$99 per user per month on annual billing, Sidebars inside Gmail, Outlook and LinkedIn plus solid mobile apps mean reps never leave where they already work, Enterprise tier includes done-for-you data migration, tailored training and a dedicated account manager |
| Cons | Requires technical capacity: PHP/MySQL/CMS admin skills or a paid partner ($100-200/hr consultants, $25-200/mo managed hosting), Dated interface and steep learning curve — dozens of config screens, scattered documentation, no native mobile app, No commercial support team; extension quality is inconsistent and upgrades/patching are your own responsibility, Total cost of ownership can exceed hosted CRMs for small organizations that must pay partners for setup and upkeep, Wrong tool for sales-driven commercial use; can be slow on very large datasets without tuning | Scope stops at sales: no branching marketing automation, help desk, quoting or custom objects, Lead search is credit-metered — 5 credits on Growth — and serious prospecting needs a separate tool like Apollo.io, User permissions and custom dashboards require Pro ($49/seat annual), so Growth teams with governance needs pay more, Enterprise's five-user minimum excludes the tiny teams that would benefit most from white-glove onboarding, Small independent vendor: thinner enterprise case-study record and ordinary small-company roadmap risk |
| Best For | Nonprofits, membership bodies, and civic organizations with in-house technical capacity or a partner budget, that need deep donor/membership/event management and want full data ownership without per-seat licensing. | Two-to-ten-person B2B teams whose deals come through relationships and whose CRM adoption has previously died of manual data entry. |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| HQ Country | US | BE |