Comparison
Clay vs Dex
Side-by-side comparison of Clay and Dex. See pricing, features, ratings, and more.
| Feature | Clay | Dex |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Reviews | 1 | 1 |
| Categories | Lead Management, AI for CRM, Contact Management | Contact Management, CRM Mobile Apps, Small Business CRM |
| Pricing | From $150 | From $12 |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Pros | Waterfall enrichment across 100+ data providers lifts email coverage far beyond any single vendor, and failed zero-result lookups generally cost nothing, Unlimited seats on every plan, including Free — rare at this price, so per-user maths never bite as the team grows, Claygent AI research columns can answer per-row questions no standard data provider covers (tech stack signals, pricing page checks, hiring intent), Free plan plus 14-day trials on paid tiers let you validate real coverage before committing, Mature push integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce, sequencers, webhooks) make it a routing layer rather than a dead-end table | Automatic sync and duplicate merging across LinkedIn, email, calendar, WhatsApp and 15+ sources builds a history you never typed, LinkedIn title-change alerts create natural, well-timed reasons to reach out — two real conversations from my first weeks of testing, Keep-in-touch reminder digest with past-conversation notes attached is a habit loop that actually sticks, Fair pricing at $12-20 per month annually billed, with map view, custom fields and two-way contact sync included early, Copilot AI and Claude/ChatGPT connectors let you query your own network in plain language |
| Cons | Two meters (Actions + Data Credits) make costs hard to forecast; adding phone numbers or AI columns can triple the bill on the same list, Not a CRM — no contact history, email sync, deal pipeline or forecasting; it must feed a second system, Provider outages inside waterfalls degrade coverage silently rather than erroring, so list quality can drop unnoticed, March 2026 pricing overhaul retired the Starter/Explorer/Pro tiers, changing the entry price for new customers and budgets for existing ones, Priority support is gated to Growth and above; Launch-plan users rely on docs and community | Not a sales CRM: no real deal pipeline, forecasting, lead scoring or sequences — it sits beside those tools, LinkedIn sync caps (2,500 on Premium, 9,000 on Professional) exclude exactly the heavy networkers the product targets, AI research credits are metered (10/20/50 per month) and enrichment of a large network burns through them quickly, Small vendor: support is email/priority-tier, the integration surface is native syncs plus API/Zapier, and one iMessage sync silently stopped logging in my testing, Email and message metadata access is core to the product — enterprise security teams will need their own review |
| Best For | Growth and outbound teams that already run a CRM and need to automate list building and enrichment at scale, with a technically curious owner in the seat. | Founders, investors, recruiters and independent consultants whose real asset is their network and whose failure mode is forgetting to keep in touch — not sales teams managing a pipeline. |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| HQ Country | US | US |