Comparison
Clay vs Salesflare
Side-by-side comparison of Clay and Salesflare. See pricing, features, ratings, and more.
| Feature | Clay | Salesflare |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Reviews | 1 | 1 |
| Categories | Lead Management, AI for CRM, Contact Management | Contact Management, Sales CRM, CRM Automation |
| Pricing | From $150 | From $0 |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Pros | Waterfall enrichment across 100+ data providers lifts email coverage far beyond any single vendor, and failed zero-result lookups generally cost nothing, Unlimited seats on every plan, including Free — rare at this price, so per-user maths never bite as the team grows, Claygent AI research columns can answer per-row questions no standard data provider covers (tech stack signals, pricing page checks, hiring intent), Free plan plus 14-day trials on paid tiers let you validate real coverage before committing, Mature push integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce, sequencers, webhooks) make it a routing layer rather than a dead-end table | Automatic data capture from email, signatures, calendars, social profiles and website visits — the CRM stays current without manual entry, Cold-relationship nudges based on real interaction cadence, not a stale 'last contacted' column, Transparent public pricing with a 30-day trial: $29/$49/$99 per user per month on annual billing, Sidebars inside Gmail, Outlook and LinkedIn plus solid mobile apps mean reps never leave where they already work, Enterprise tier includes done-for-you data migration, tailored training and a dedicated account manager |
| Cons | Two meters (Actions + Data Credits) make costs hard to forecast; adding phone numbers or AI columns can triple the bill on the same list, Not a CRM — no contact history, email sync, deal pipeline or forecasting; it must feed a second system, Provider outages inside waterfalls degrade coverage silently rather than erroring, so list quality can drop unnoticed, March 2026 pricing overhaul retired the Starter/Explorer/Pro tiers, changing the entry price for new customers and budgets for existing ones, Priority support is gated to Growth and above; Launch-plan users rely on docs and community | Scope stops at sales: no branching marketing automation, help desk, quoting or custom objects, Lead search is credit-metered — 5 credits on Growth — and serious prospecting needs a separate tool like Apollo.io, User permissions and custom dashboards require Pro ($49/seat annual), so Growth teams with governance needs pay more, Enterprise's five-user minimum excludes the tiny teams that would benefit most from white-glove onboarding, Small independent vendor: thinner enterprise case-study record and ordinary small-company roadmap risk |
| Best For | Growth and outbound teams that already run a CRM and need to automate list building and enrichment at scale, with a technically curious owner in the seat. | Two-to-ten-person B2B teams whose deals come through relationships and whose CRM adoption has previously died of manual data entry. |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| HQ Country | US | BE |