Comparison
Clay vs Teamleader
Side-by-side comparison of Clay and Teamleader. See pricing, features, ratings, and more.
| Feature | Clay | Teamleader |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Reviews | 1 | 1 |
| Categories | Lead Management, AI for CRM, Contact Management | Project CRM, ERP with CRM, Contact Management |
| Pricing | From $150 | From $59 |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Pros | Waterfall enrichment across 100+ data providers lifts email coverage far beyond any single vendor, and failed zero-result lookups generally cost nothing, Unlimited seats on every plan, including Free — rare at this price, so per-user maths never bite as the team grows, Claygent AI research columns can answer per-row questions no standard data provider covers (tech stack signals, pricing page checks, hiring intent), Free plan plus 14-day trials on paid tiers let you validate real coverage before committing, Mature push integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce, sequencers, webhooks) make it a routing layer rather than a dead-end table | One data model across CRM, projects, time tracking and invoicing — quote-to-invoice without copy-paste between tools, European fit: Peppol e-invoicing, GDPR-era handling, multilingual human support, Belgian vendor since 2012, Structural discounts favour growth: about 17% annual, 50% off from the sixth user, 25% off the first invoice, Booster model lets you add project management, planning, shared inbox or work orders only where needed, Mature product with a decade of shipping behind it; 14-day trial without a credit card to test fit |
| Cons | Two meters (Actions + Data Credits) make costs hard to forecast; adding phone numbers or AI columns can triple the bill on the same list, Not a CRM — no contact history, email sync, deal pipeline or forecasting; it must feed a second system, Provider outages inside waterfalls degrade coverage silently rather than erroring, so list quality can drop unnoticed, March 2026 pricing overhaul retired the Starter/Explorer/Pro tiers, changing the entry price for new customers and budgets for existing ones, Priority support is gated to Growth and above; Launch-plan users rely on docs and community | Rigid where it matters: limited CRM customisation, weak exports and no attribution modelling for marketing-led teams, Booster pricing stacks up fast — the from-price is not the price once you add PM, planning and shared inbox, Retainer-style work fits poorly; the model assumes fixed-price projects with clear milestones, Automation depth trails configurable rivals; several routine steps stay manual, Recent Capterra reviews flag support communication problems and a disputed price increase — read contract terms closely |
| Best For | Growth and outbound teams that already run a CRM and need to automate list building and enrichment at scale, with a technically curious owner in the seat. | European services companies of roughly 5–20 people running fixed-price projects who want CRM, project delivery and invoicing in one system with local e-invoicing compliance. |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| HQ Country | US | BE |