Comparison
Close vs CiviCRM
Side-by-side comparison of Close and CiviCRM. See pricing, features, ratings, and more.
| Feature | Close | CiviCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Reviews | 1 | 1 |
| Categories | Sales CRM, Sales Automation, Contact Management | Contact Management, CRM Customization, CRM Integrations |
| Pricing | From $9 | From $0 |
| Pricing Model | paid | free |
| Pros | Calling, SMS, email and shared inbox live inside the lead record, so activity logging happens without rep effort, Power Dialer and voicemail drop on the Growth plan materially raise dials per hour in high-volume outbound, Fast, keyboard-first interface that reps adopt without training overhead, Chloe AI credits bundled on every plan; call summaries and follow-up drafts were genuinely useful in my testing, Generous entry point: Solo at $9/user/month billed annually, with a 30-day money-back guarantee and no long contract | $0 license with no per-user, per-contact, or per-donation fees — unbeatable economics for large or complex constituent databases, Deepest nonprofit feature set available: contributions, pledges, memberships, events, grants, case management, advocacy, Runs inside WordPress/Drupal/Joomla/Backdrop so website activity and CRM records share one database with no sync layer, Actively developed (6.19 released October 2026, monthly releases, ESR line supported to April 2027); full data ownership under AGPL, CiviSpark hosted option from $15/month per instance with unlimited users removes the ops burden for small organizations |
| Cons | Automated workflows and the Power Dialer are gated behind Growth at $99/user/year-billed — nearly triple the Essentials price, Metered extras (phone numbers, call minutes, SMS, extra AI credits) push the real bill well above the seat price for dial-heavy teams, CRM core is shallow on reporting, custom objects and forecasting compared with Pipedrive or HubSpot at similar prices, Solo plan caps at 1 user and 10,000 leads and excludes workflows; no free plan exists, AI credits are pooled per month and do not roll over, so heavy Chloe usage can exhaust the allowance mid-month | Requires technical capacity: PHP/MySQL/CMS admin skills or a paid partner ($100-200/hr consultants, $25-200/mo managed hosting), Dated interface and steep learning curve — dozens of config screens, scattered documentation, no native mobile app, No commercial support team; extension quality is inconsistent and upgrades/patching are your own responsibility, Total cost of ownership can exceed hosted CRMs for small organizations that must pay partners for setup and upkeep, Wrong tool for sales-driven commercial use; can be slow on very large datasets without tuning |
| Best For | Inside-sales and outbound teams of roughly 2-50 reps who live on the phone and email and want activity logging to be automatic rather than enforced. | Nonprofits, membership bodies, and civic organizations with in-house technical capacity or a partner budget, that need deep donor/membership/event management and want full data ownership without per-seat licensing. |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| HQ Country | US | US |