Comparison
Close vs Salesflare
Side-by-side comparison of Close and Salesflare. See pricing, features, ratings, and more.
| Feature | Close | Salesflare |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Reviews | 1 | 1 |
| Categories | Sales CRM, Sales Automation, Contact Management | Contact Management, Sales CRM, CRM Automation |
| Pricing | From $9 | From $0 |
| Pricing Model | paid | freemium |
| Pros | Calling, SMS, email and shared inbox live inside the lead record, so activity logging happens without rep effort, Power Dialer and voicemail drop on the Growth plan materially raise dials per hour in high-volume outbound, Fast, keyboard-first interface that reps adopt without training overhead, Chloe AI credits bundled on every plan; call summaries and follow-up drafts were genuinely useful in my testing, Generous entry point: Solo at $9/user/month billed annually, with a 30-day money-back guarantee and no long contract | Automatic data capture from email, signatures, calendars, social profiles and website visits — the CRM stays current without manual entry, Cold-relationship nudges based on real interaction cadence, not a stale 'last contacted' column, Transparent public pricing with a 30-day trial: $29/$49/$99 per user per month on annual billing, Sidebars inside Gmail, Outlook and LinkedIn plus solid mobile apps mean reps never leave where they already work, Enterprise tier includes done-for-you data migration, tailored training and a dedicated account manager |
| Cons | Automated workflows and the Power Dialer are gated behind Growth at $99/user/year-billed — nearly triple the Essentials price, Metered extras (phone numbers, call minutes, SMS, extra AI credits) push the real bill well above the seat price for dial-heavy teams, CRM core is shallow on reporting, custom objects and forecasting compared with Pipedrive or HubSpot at similar prices, Solo plan caps at 1 user and 10,000 leads and excludes workflows; no free plan exists, AI credits are pooled per month and do not roll over, so heavy Chloe usage can exhaust the allowance mid-month | Scope stops at sales: no branching marketing automation, help desk, quoting or custom objects, Lead search is credit-metered — 5 credits on Growth — and serious prospecting needs a separate tool like Apollo.io, User permissions and custom dashboards require Pro ($49/seat annual), so Growth teams with governance needs pay more, Enterprise's five-user minimum excludes the tiny teams that would benefit most from white-glove onboarding, Small independent vendor: thinner enterprise case-study record and ordinary small-company roadmap risk |
| Best For | Inside-sales and outbound teams of roughly 2-50 reps who live on the phone and email and want activity logging to be automatic rather than enforced. | Two-to-ten-person B2B teams whose deals come through relationships and whose CRM adoption has previously died of manual data entry. |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| HQ Country | US | BE |