Comparison
SugarCRM vs Creatio
Side-by-side comparison of SugarCRM and Creatio. See pricing, features, ratings, and more.
| Feature | SugarCRM | Creatio |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.5 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Reviews | 1 | 1 |
| Categories | Sales CRM, CRM Reporting, Enterprise CRM | CRM Automation, Enterprise CRM, CRM Customization |
| Pricing | From $59 | From $0 |
| Pricing Model | paid | freemium |
| Pros | Forecasting and multi-stakeholder opportunity management fit real mid-market pipeline reviews, On-premises/private-cloud deployment via Sugar Enterprise is one of the few left in the category, Sugar Connect inbox sync genuinely reduces manual activity logging, Highly configurable data model, permissions and workflow with open REST APIs, Marketing automation (Sugar Market) includes unlimited users and prices by contacts instead | Shared BPM/process engine across Sales, Marketing and Service handles cross-functional flows no lightweight CRM can express, Full no-code Studio on the Enterprise tier: visual processes with branching, parallel flows, timers, custom objects and business rules, API calls are not metered on Enterprise and above — uncommon and valuable for integration-heavy deployments, On-premise and private-cloud deployment options exist alongside SaaS, which keeps regulated buyers in the room, Materially cheaper than comparable Salesforce Enterprise deployments in the deal models I have seen |
| Cons | Fifteen-seat minimum on every Sugar Sell tier — roughly $10,620/year floor before anything else, The SugarAI rebrand has made pricing and edition documentation inconsistent across sources, Sell, Market and Serve are separate contracts with separate pricing models, not one bundle, Integration marketplace is modest next to Salesforce or HubSpot, Interface and admin workflows carry legacy weight; routine record management takes more clicks than it should | $10,000 annual minimum on a standard three-year term — a serious commitment before a single seat is used, Modules stack at $15/user/month each on Growth/Enterprise; realistic mid-market cost lands near $90/user/month, Heavy admin learning curve; ungoverned customisation becomes an expensive mess without a named platform owner, Version upgrades can disturb customisations, and reviewers report inconsistent support responses below top tiers, Marketing automation depth still trails dedicated platforms; niche integrations usually mean API work |
| Best For | Mid-market sales organisations with 15+ seats and real process complexity — especially those needing on-premises or private-cloud deployment control — who will configure the platform rather than just sign into it. | Mid-market and enterprise organisations with real cross-functional process complexity, a named platform owner, and a budget for partner-led implementation — especially Salesforce refugees and regulated firms needing on-prem options. |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| HQ Country | US | US |