Comparison
Teamleader vs Apollo.io
Side-by-side comparison of Teamleader and Apollo.io. See pricing, features, ratings, and more.
| Feature | Teamleader | Apollo.io |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Reviews | 1 | 1 |
| Categories | Project CRM, ERP with CRM, Contact Management | Lead Management, Sales Automation, Contact Management |
| Pricing | From $59 | From $49 |
| Pricing Model | paid | freemium |
| Pros | One data model across CRM, projects, time tracking and invoicing — quote-to-invoice without copy-paste between tools, European fit: Peppol e-invoicing, GDPR-era handling, multilingual human support, Belgian vendor since 2012, Structural discounts favour growth: about 17% annual, 50% off from the sixth user, 25% off the first invoice, Booster model lets you add project management, planning, shared inbox or work orders only where needed, Mature product with a decade of shipping behind it; 14-day trial without a credit card to test fit | 275M+ contact database with intent topics, job-change signals, and visitor identification in one tool, Fast filter-to-sequence workflow — outbound campaign live the same afternoon, with dialer and meeting scheduling included, Genuinely usable free plan (900 credits/seat/year) and a $49 Basic tier that replaces a database + sequencer stack, Native Salesforce, HubSpot, and Pipedrive integrations so it can sit alongside a real CRM, High review volume and satisfaction (4.7/5 across 9,000+ G2 reviews at time of writing) |
| Cons | Rigid where it matters: limited CRM customisation, weak exports and no attribution modelling for marketing-led teams, Booster pricing stacks up fast — the from-price is not the price once you add PM, planning and shared inbox, Retainer-style work fits poorly; the model assumes fixed-price projects with clear milestones, Automation depth trails configurable rivals; several routine steps stay manual, Recent Capterra reviews flag support communication problems and a disputed price increase — read contract terms closely | Data accuracy below the vendor's 98% claim in practice — 10-15% bounce rates on unverified lists, weaker data outside North America, Credit system is confusing: pooled, no rollover, auto-renewing add-on credits, and all seats must share one plan tier, Reporting is shallow and the interface adds clicks where it shouldn't; no mobile app for data access, CRM and deal layer too thin for complex, multi-stakeholder sales cycles, Users report credit-rule changes over time that unfavorably affected annual-billing customers |
| Best For | European services companies of roughly 5–20 people running fixed-price projects who want CRM, project delivery and invoicing in one system with local e-invoicing compliance. | Outbound-focused SMB and mid-market sales teams that need B2B contact data plus sequencing in one subscription and already run their pipeline in a dedicated CRM. |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| HQ Country | BE | US |