Comparison
Teamleader vs Close
Side-by-side comparison of Teamleader and Close. See pricing, features, ratings, and more.
| Feature | Teamleader | Close |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Reviews | 1 | 1 |
| Categories | Project CRM, ERP with CRM, Contact Management | Sales CRM, Sales Automation, Contact Management |
| Pricing | From $59 | From $9 |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Pros | One data model across CRM, projects, time tracking and invoicing — quote-to-invoice without copy-paste between tools, European fit: Peppol e-invoicing, GDPR-era handling, multilingual human support, Belgian vendor since 2012, Structural discounts favour growth: about 17% annual, 50% off from the sixth user, 25% off the first invoice, Booster model lets you add project management, planning, shared inbox or work orders only where needed, Mature product with a decade of shipping behind it; 14-day trial without a credit card to test fit | Calling, SMS, email and shared inbox live inside the lead record, so activity logging happens without rep effort, Power Dialer and voicemail drop on the Growth plan materially raise dials per hour in high-volume outbound, Fast, keyboard-first interface that reps adopt without training overhead, Chloe AI credits bundled on every plan; call summaries and follow-up drafts were genuinely useful in my testing, Generous entry point: Solo at $9/user/month billed annually, with a 30-day money-back guarantee and no long contract |
| Cons | Rigid where it matters: limited CRM customisation, weak exports and no attribution modelling for marketing-led teams, Booster pricing stacks up fast — the from-price is not the price once you add PM, planning and shared inbox, Retainer-style work fits poorly; the model assumes fixed-price projects with clear milestones, Automation depth trails configurable rivals; several routine steps stay manual, Recent Capterra reviews flag support communication problems and a disputed price increase — read contract terms closely | Automated workflows and the Power Dialer are gated behind Growth at $99/user/year-billed — nearly triple the Essentials price, Metered extras (phone numbers, call minutes, SMS, extra AI credits) push the real bill well above the seat price for dial-heavy teams, CRM core is shallow on reporting, custom objects and forecasting compared with Pipedrive or HubSpot at similar prices, Solo plan caps at 1 user and 10,000 leads and excludes workflows; no free plan exists, AI credits are pooled per month and do not roll over, so heavy Chloe usage can exhaust the allowance mid-month |
| Best For | European services companies of roughly 5–20 people running fixed-price projects who want CRM, project delivery and invoicing in one system with local e-invoicing compliance. | Inside-sales and outbound teams of roughly 2-50 reps who live on the phone and email and want activity logging to be automatic rather than enforced. |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| HQ Country | BE | US |